AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W7100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 920 MHz vs 889 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 714.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 672 vs 592
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.086 vs 22.384
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 361.58 vs 290.861
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3679
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3679
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 vs 18 February 2014 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz vs 889 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 672 vs 592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.086 vs 22.384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 361.58 vs 290.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 103.0 GTexel / s
- Around 61% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 1792
- Around 71% better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 3,297 gflops
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8972 vs 5264
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27012 vs 24794
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.677 vs 65.781
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1293.474 vs 1248.285
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.988 vs 5.854
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 vs 6362
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 vs 6362
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec vs 103.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops vs 3,297 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8972 vs 5264 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27012 vs 24794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 vs 65.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1293.474 vs 1248.285 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 vs 5.854 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 vs 6362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 vs 6362 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W7100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W7100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5264 | 8972 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 672 | 592 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24794 | 27012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.781 | 72.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1248.285 | 1293.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.854 | 7.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.086 | 22.384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 361.58 | 290.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6362 | 8721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6362 | 8721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W7100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tonga | GK110B |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 451 | 452 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.82 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 889 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 5,645 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2880 |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 GTexel / s | 213 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 7,080 million |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 336 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |