NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 192 billion / sec vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1344
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 6,691 gflops vs 2,634 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12919 vs 5427
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 836 vs 694
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9834 vs 8276
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 vs 3627
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9834 vs 8276
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 vs 3627
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2015 vs 25 August 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 192 billion / sec vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 1344 |
Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops vs 2,634 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12919 vs 5427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 836 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9834 vs 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 vs 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9834 vs 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 vs 3627 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 858.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12919 | 5427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 836 | 694 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.231 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.566 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.245 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.225 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 518.554 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9834 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9834 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5332 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM200 | GK104 |
Launch date | 17 March 2015 | 25 August 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Place in performance rating | 319 | 320 |
Price now | $1,999.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 915 MHz |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops | 2,634 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 192 billion / sec | 109.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.5 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost |