NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X and NVIDIA Quadro CX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

NVIDIA Quadro CX

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 602 MHz
5x more texture fill rate: 192 billion / sec vs 38.5 GTexel / s
16x more pipelines: 3072 vs 192
14.5x better floating-point performance: 6,691 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 1536 MB
13.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13048 vs 947
Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 454

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 March 2015 vs 11 November 2008
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 602 MHz
Texture fill rate	192 billion / sec vs 38.5 GTexel / s
Pipelines	3072 vs 192
Floating-point performance	6,691 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 1536 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	13048 vs 947
PassMark - G2D Mark	847 vs 454

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro CX

Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
228.6x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro CX

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

13048

947

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

847

454

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X	NVIDIA Quadro CX
PassMark - G3D Mark	13048	947
PassMark - G2D Mark	847	454
Geekbench - OpenCL	40196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	518.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5228

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X	NVIDIA Quadro CX
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GM200	GT200B
Launch date	17 March 2015	11 November 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	$1,999
Place in performance rating	314	315
Price now	$1,999.99	$149.95
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	7.38	8.20
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1075 MHz
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	602 MHz
CUDA cores	3072
Floating-point performance	6,691 gflops	462.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	3072	192
Texture fill rate	192 billion / sec	38.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	8,000 million	1,400 million
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)	267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt
SLI options	4x
Supplementary power connectors	6-pin + 8-pin	1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	1536 MB
Memory bandwidth	336.5 GB / s	76.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Technologies
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost