AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1075 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 1000x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1987.633 vs 1722.566
  • 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 105.263 vs 38.225
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.677 vs 518.554
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10320 vs 9834
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10320 vs 9834
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 November 2016 vs 17 March 2015
Core clock speed 1188 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed 1243 MHz vs 1075 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1987.633 vs 1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 105.263 vs 38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 597.677 vs 518.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10320 vs 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3347 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10320 vs 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3347 vs 3343

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

  • Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 192 billion / sec vs 179.0 GTexel / s
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
  • Around 17% better floating-point performance: 6,691 gflops vs 5,728 gflops
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12929 vs 7847
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 834 vs 807
  • Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41155 vs 38420
  • Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.231 vs 115.834
  • Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.245 vs 10.152
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 vs 3575
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 vs 3575
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 192 billion / sec vs 179.0 GTexel / s
Pipelines 3072 vs 2304
Floating-point performance 6,691 gflops vs 5,728 gflops
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 12929 vs 7847
PassMark - G2D Mark 834 vs 807
Geekbench - OpenCL 41155 vs 38420
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 157.231 vs 115.834
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.245 vs 10.152
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3700 vs 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3700 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7847
12929
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
807
834
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
38420
41155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
115.834
157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1987.633
1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.152
12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
105.263
38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
597.677
518.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10320
9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3575
3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3347
3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10320
9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3575
3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3347
3343
Name AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
PassMark - G3D Mark 7847 12929
PassMark - G2D Mark 807 834
Geekbench - OpenCL 38420 41155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 115.834 157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1987.633 1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.152 12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 105.263 38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 597.677 518.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10320 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3575 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3347 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10320 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3575 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3347 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5307

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Maxwell 2.0
Code name Ellesmere GM200
Launch date 10 November 2016 17 March 2015
Launch price (MSRP) $799 $999
Place in performance rating 326 327
Price now $539.99 $1,999.99
Type Workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 19.25 7.38

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1243 MHz 1075 MHz
Core clock speed 1188 MHz 1000 MHz
Floating-point performance 5,728 gflops 6,691 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2304 3072
Texture fill rate 179.0 GTexel / s 192 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 8,000 million
CUDA cores 3072

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 241 mm 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 6-pin + 8-pin
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt
SLI options 4x

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 224.0 GB / s 336.5 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost