AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1075 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 1000x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1987.633 vs 1722.566
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 105.263 vs 38.225
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.677 vs 518.554
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10320 vs 9834
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10320 vs 9834

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

• Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 192 billion / sec vs 179.0 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 6,691 gflops vs 5,728 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12917 vs 7825
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 837 vs 801
• Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41155 vs 38420
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.231 vs 115.834
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.245 vs 10.152
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 vs 3575
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7825 12917
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	801 837
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	38420 41155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.834 157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1987.633 1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.152 12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	105.263 38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	597.677 518.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10320 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10320 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 3343

Compare specifications (specs)