NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200 and ATI Mobility Radeon X700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 450 MHz vs 350 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 110 nm
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 700 MHz vs 600 MHz
Launch date | 1 September 2006 vs 1 March 2005 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 110 nm |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon X700
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 2.8 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 8 vs 4
- 2x more maximum memory size: 128 MB vs 64 MB
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 67 vs 45
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 200 vs 199
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2.8 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum memory size | 128 MB vs 64 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 67 vs 45 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 200 vs 199 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200 | ATI Mobility Radeon X700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 45 | 67 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 | 200 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200 | ATI Mobility Radeon X700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | R400 |
Code name | G72 | M26 |
Launch date | 1 September 2006 | 1 March 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 882 | 883 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | 350 MHz |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 4 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 112 million | 120 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2.8 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 350 Bit | 350 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | 600 MHz |
Memory type | 32 | 128 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
PCIe |