NVIDIA Quadro K500M vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K500M and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 89% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 7.6x more texture fill rate: 13.6 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 48x more pipelines: 192 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 64 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 10.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 480 vs 45
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 June 2012 vs 1 September 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 4 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 64 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 480 vs 45 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 199 vs 184
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 vs 184 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K500M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 184 | 199 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 480 | 45 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K500M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Curie |
| Code name | GK107 | G72 |
| Launch date | 1 June 2012 | 1 September 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 905 | 908 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 4 |
| Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 112 million |
| Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 2.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 350 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | 32 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
