NVIDIA GeForce Go 7700 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce Go 7700 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 450 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 5.4 GTexel / s vs 1.2 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 12 vs 4
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 148 vs 48
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 August 2006 vs 1 June 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 450 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 5.4 GTexel / s vs 1.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 12 vs 4 |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 vs 48 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 236 vs 232
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 vs 232 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7700 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 | 48 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 236 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce Go 7700 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Curie | Curie |
| Code name | G73 | G72 |
| Launch date | 1 August 2006 | 1 June 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 773 | 774 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 4 |
| Texture fill rate | 5.4 GTexel / s | 1.2 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 177 million | 112 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 4.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 500 Bit | 600 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Memory type | 128 | 64 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CineFX 4.0 | ||
| Intellisample 4.0 | ||
| PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
| UltraShadow II | ||
