NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs AMD FirePro W4170M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and AMD FirePro W4170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 29.81 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 38% better floating-point performance: 953.9 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1814 vs 1056
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 vs 15.502
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 2802
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2689
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 2802
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2689
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 28 April 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1122 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 vs 1056 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6461 vs 6460 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 vs 15.502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2689 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 195
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 vs 195 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4170M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | AMD FirePro W4170M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 | 1056 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 211 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6461 | 6460 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 15.502 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2689 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | AMD FirePro W4170M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM108 | Mars |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 28 April 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1013 | 1016 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz | 900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 825 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
Powerplay |