NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce MX130

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 6 month(s) later
2.8x more core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 400 MHz
9.3x more texture fill rate: 29.81 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
37.3x better floating-point performance: 953.9 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
4.2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1200 MHz
20.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1814 vs 87
3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1027
3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1027

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 November 2017 vs 9 May 2007
Core clock speed	1122 MHz vs 400 MHz
Texture fill rate	29.81 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 16
Floating-point performance	953.9 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 80 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1814 vs 87
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 1027
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 1027

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 30 Watt
Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 308 vs 195

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	17 Watt vs 30 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	308 vs 195

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1814

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

195

308

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

1027

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

1027

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX130	NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1814	87
PassMark - G2D Mark	195	308
Geekbench - OpenCL	6461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	31.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	406.203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.251
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	107.608
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	1027
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	1027
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	632

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX130	NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla
Code name	GM108	G86
Launch date	17 November 2017	9 May 2007
Place in performance rating	1013	1010
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1242 MHz
Core clock speed	1122 MHz	400 MHz
Floating-point performance	953.9 gflops	25.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	80 nm
Pipelines	384	16
Texture fill rate	29.81 GTexel / s	3.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	17 Watt
Transistor count		210 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB / s	9.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5 / DDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
CUDA
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
Optimus
PowerMizer 7.0