NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and AMD Radeon HD 6750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 29.81 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 86 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 4.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1855 vs 1047
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 vs 8.039
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.034 vs 0.867
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 vs 20.664
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 vs 91.074
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2796 vs 2100
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 3378
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2796 vs 2100
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 3378

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750

• Around 88% higher pipelines: 720 vs 384
• Around 6% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 271 vs 198
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 544.041 vs 406.203

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1855 1047
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	198 271
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.613 8.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	406.203 544.041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.034 0.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.251 20.664
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	107.608 91.074
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 2100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 3378
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 2100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 3378
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3358

Compare specifications (specs)