NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• 3.7x more core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1856 vs 1739
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 vs 29.115
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 vs 54.932
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2796 vs 2780
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 1884
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2796 vs 2780
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 1884
• Around 2% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 632 vs 619

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
• Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 199
• Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7344 vs 6437
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.109 vs 31.613
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 465.116 vs 406.203
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.796 vs 2.034

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1856 1739
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	199 363
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6437 7344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.613 37.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	406.203 465.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.034 2.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.251 29.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	107.608 54.932
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 2780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 1884
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 2780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 1884
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	632 619

Compare specifications (specs)