NVIDIA GeForce MX130 versus AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and AMD Radeon HD 6750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 38% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1242 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 18% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 29.81 GTexel / s versus 25.2 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 86 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 4.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1854 versus 1047
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 versus 8.039
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.034 versus 0.867
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 versus 20.664
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 versus 91.074
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2796 versus 2100
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 versus 3378
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2796 versus 2100
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 versus 3378
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 November 2017 versus 21 January 2011 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1242 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s versus 25.2 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 86 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1854 versus 1047 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 versus 8.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 versus 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 versus 20.664 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 versus 91.074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 versus 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 versus 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 versus 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 versus 3378 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6750
- Environ 88% de pipelines plus haut: 720 versus 384
- Environ 6% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,008.0 gflops versus 953.9 gflops
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 271 versus 198
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 544.041 versus 406.203
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 720 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,008.0 gflops versus 953.9 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 271 versus 198 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.041 versus 406.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1854 | 1047 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 | 271 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6440 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 8.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 544.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 20.664 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 91.074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GM108 | Juniper |
Date de sortie | 17 November 2017 | 21 January 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1043 | 1037 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $49.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $49.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 33.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1242 MHz | 900 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1122 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 720 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 86 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 170 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |