NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce 820M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 810 MHz
• 3x more texture fill rate: 29.81 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
• 4x better floating-point performance: 953.9 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1802 MHz
• 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1814 vs 490
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 114
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6461 vs 2789
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 vs 7.765
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 406.203 vs 161.305
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.034 vs 0.686
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 vs 14.257
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 vs 22.768
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2796 vs 1195
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 1447
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2796 vs 1195
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 1447

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

• Around 34% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 847 vs 632

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 820M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1814 490
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	195 114
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6461 2789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.613 7.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	406.203 161.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.034 0.686
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.251 14.257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	107.608 22.768
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	632 847

Compare specifications (specs)