NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon RX 550
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce MX150 und AMD Radeon RX 550 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Etwa 24% höhere Texturfüllrate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
- 939.2x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,127 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- 5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 33.507
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 140.911
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 940
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2158
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 940
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2158
- 7.9x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 vs 127
| Spezifikationen | |
| Texturfüllrate | 46.98 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,127 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 vs 33.507 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 vs 140.911 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2158 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 vs 127 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 550
- Etwa 17% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1100 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Etwa 14% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1183 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Etwa 33% höhere Leitungssysteme: 512 vs 384
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Etwa 40% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 2259
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 213
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 9584
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 495.238
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 2.365
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 38.965
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 4330
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 4330
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1100 MHz vs 937 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1183 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Leitungssysteme | 512 vs 384 |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 vs 2259 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 213 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 vs 9584 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 495.238 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 vs 2.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 vs 38.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 vs 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 vs 4330 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2259 | 2690 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 476 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9584 | 11610 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | 33.507 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | 1037.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | 3.064 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | 52.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | 140.911 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | 4485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | 4485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 940 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2158 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 | 127 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Codename | GP108 | Lexa |
| Startdatum | 17 May 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 875 | 876 |
| Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN-Generierung | 4th Gen | |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $75 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1038 MHz | 1183 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 937 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,127 gflops | 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 | 512 |
| Texturfüllrate | 46.98 GTexel / s | 37.86 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 10 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,800 million | 2,200 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop-Größe | large | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
| Länge | 145 mm | |
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 48.06 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||