NVIDIA GeForce MX150 versus AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and AMD Radeon RX 550 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Environ 24% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 46.98 GTexel / s versus 37.86 GTexel / s
- 939.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,127 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 versus 33.507
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 versus 140.911
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 940
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 2158
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 940
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 2158
- 7.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 versus 127
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel / s versus 37.86 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 1,127 gflops versus 1.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 versus 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 versus 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 versus 127 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 550
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1100 MHz versus 937 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1183 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 versus 2259
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 versus 213
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 versus 9584
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 versus 495.238
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 versus 2.365
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 versus 38.965
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 versus 4330
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 versus 4330
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz versus 937 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1183 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 versus 2259 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 versus 213 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 versus 9584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 versus 495.238 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 versus 2.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 versus 38.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 versus 4330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 versus 4330 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2259 | 2690 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 476 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9584 | 11610 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | 1037.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | 52.533 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 | 127 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | GP108 | Lexa |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 875 | 876 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Prix maintenant | $75 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | 1183 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,127 gflops | 1.2 TFLOPs |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel / s | 37.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 2,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 48.06 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |