NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs Intel HD Graphics 620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and Intel HD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• 3.1x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 86% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• 2.8x better floating-point performance: 1,127 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2259 vs 922
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9584 vs 4178
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 24.275
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 vs 227.879
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 vs 1.508
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 15.582
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 30.288
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 1404
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1733
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 1404
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1733
• 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 vs 343

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 213

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2259 922
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	213 216
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9584 4178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 24.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 227.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 1.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 15.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 30.288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 343

Compare specifications (specs)