NVIDIA GeForce MX150 versus Intel HD Graphics 620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and Intel HD Graphics 620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 937 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 86% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 46.98 GTexel / s versus 25.2 GTexel / s
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- 2.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,127 gflops versus 403.2 gflops
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 15 Watt
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2259 versus 922
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9584 versus 4178
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 versus 24.275
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 versus 227.879
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 versus 1.508
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 versus 15.582
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 versus 30.288
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 versus 1404
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 1733
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 versus 1404
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 1733
- 2.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 versus 343
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 30 August 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel / s versus 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,127 gflops versus 403.2 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 15 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2259 versus 922 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9584 versus 4178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 versus 24.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 versus 227.879 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 versus 1.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 versus 15.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 versus 30.288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 versus 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 versus 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 versus 343 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 620
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 versus 213
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 versus 213 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | Intel HD Graphics 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2259 | 922 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 216 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9584 | 4178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | 24.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | 227.879 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | 1.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | 15.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | 30.288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 | 343 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | Intel HD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | GP108 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 30 August 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 875 | 1334 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | 300 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,127 gflops | 403.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 32 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 48.06 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |