NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 19.6x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 7.7x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 454.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2271 vs 5
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 214 vs 194
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 vs 19 February 2002 |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2271 vs 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 vs 194 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2271 | 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 994 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kelvin |
Code name | GP108 | NV25 A2 |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 19 February 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 913 | 910 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 63 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | 10.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 650 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 |