NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 914 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 993 MHz
- Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 39.72 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 1973
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2188
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3289
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 1973
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2188
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3289
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 914 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s vs 39.72 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 vs 1973 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 vs 1973 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3289 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 1,271 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2568 vs 2271
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 262 vs 214
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10292 vs 9622
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops vs 1,127 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2568 vs 2271 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 262 vs 214 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10292 vs 9622 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2271 | 2568 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 262 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9622 | 10292 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | 1973 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | 1973 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3289 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 989 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | GP108 | GM107 |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 914 | 915 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 993 MHz |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 914 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 1,271 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | 39.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |