NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 628 MHz
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 657 MHz
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 42.05 GTexel / s
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 1,127 gflops vs 1,009 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4008 MHz
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2271 vs 1226
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 953
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1552
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 953
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1552
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 vs 17 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 628 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 657 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s vs 42.05 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops vs 1,009 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2271 vs 1226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1552 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1552 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 vs 214
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 vs 214 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2271 | 1226 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 384 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9607 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1552 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1552 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 994 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP108 | GK106 |
Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 17 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 913 | 914 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 657 MHz |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 628 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | 42.05 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | 64.13 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |