NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs AMD Radeon 520
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and AMD Radeon 520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 34% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1830 vs 865
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 214 vs 203
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2680 vs 1182
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 1242
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2680 vs 1182
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 1242
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1519 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1830 vs 865 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 vs 203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 vs 1182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 1242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 vs 1182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 1242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 520
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26304 vs 6740
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 vs 6740 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 520
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | AMD Radeon 520 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1830 | 865 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 203 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6740 | 26304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | 1182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 1242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | 1182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 1242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | AMD Radeon 520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP108 | Oland |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 981 | 1109 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 1st Gen | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1519 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 5 | |
Floating-point performance | 660 GFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 4.10 GP/s | |
Render output units | 4 | |
Stream Processors | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 20 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |