NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX230

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 4.3x more core clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1830 vs 1237
• Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6740 vs 4657
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 445.82 vs 354.254
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.43 vs 20.323
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 102.234 vs 29.327
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2680 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3309
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2680 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3309

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 214
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 21.591
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 1.736

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1830 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	214 299
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6740 4657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.591 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	445.82 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.736 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.43 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.234 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3309

Compare specifications (specs)