NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2.3x more boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 32x more pipelines: 384 vs 12
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 8.9x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 89 Watt
- 5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 17.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2399 vs 138
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 240 vs 198
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 24 February 2005 |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 12 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 89 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2399 vs 138 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 vs 198 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2399 | 138 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 198 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9257 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Curie |
Code name | GP108B | NV41 |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 24 February 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 886 | 883 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 450 MHz |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 12 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 89 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 222 million |
Texture fill rate | 5.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 600 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 |