NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 vs 1608
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9329 vs 7151
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 2652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1564
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3340
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 2652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1564
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3340
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 3 January 2017 |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 vs 1608 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9329 vs 7151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 vs 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 vs 240
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 vs 240 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 | 1608 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 358 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9329 | 7151 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 2652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 1564 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | GP108B | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 3 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 861 | 862 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 189 million |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |