NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 vs 2259
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 240 vs 213
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 45.905
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 vs 495.238
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.64 vs 2.365
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 vs 38.965
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 17 May 2017 |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 vs 2259 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 vs 213 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 vs 45.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 vs 495.238 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 vs 2.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 vs 38.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9584 vs 9329
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 141.816
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 4027
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 4027
- Around 13% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 999 vs 888
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9584 vs 9329 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 vs 141.816 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 vs 4027 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 vs 4027 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 vs 888 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 | 2259 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 213 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9329 | 9584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | 45.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | 495.238 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | 2.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | 38.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | 145.794 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 4330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 4330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 | 999 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP108B | GP108 |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 17 May 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 861 | 875 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 937 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 |