NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs AMD Radeon Pro 455
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and AMD Radeon Pro 455 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 79% higher core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 855 MHz
- 932.3x more texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 41.04 GTexel / s
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2784 vs 1762
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2784 vs 1762
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 30 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s vs 41.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 vs 1762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 vs 1762 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 455
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11291 vs 10876
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 230
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3113 vs 2453
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4146 vs 3808
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4146 vs 3808
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11291 vs 10876 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 230 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3113 vs 2453 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4146 vs 3808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4146 vs 3808 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 455
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | AMD Radeon Pro 455 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10876 | 11291 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 705 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2453 | 3113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 | 1762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 | 1762 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 | 4146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 | 4146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.484 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 573.646 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.793 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 148.673 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | AMD Radeon Pro 455 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP108 | Baffin |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 30 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 765 | 671 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 855 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 25.50 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s | 41.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1800 million | 3,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,313 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 81.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | 5080 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |