NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 1292.6x more texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10876 vs 9616
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2453 vs 1938
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3808 vs 2809
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3808 vs 2809
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 30 June 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10876 vs 9616 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2453 vs 1938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 vs 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 vs 2809 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 3x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 535 vs 230
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 2784
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 2784
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 535 vs 230 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 vs 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 vs 2784 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10876 | 9616 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 535 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2453 | 1938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 | 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 | 2809 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP108 | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 30 June 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 765 | 768 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 25.50 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s | 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1800 million | 1,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX330 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon X600 SE
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
