NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 1292.6x more texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10707 vs 9662
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2422 vs 1901
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3808 vs 2809
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3808 vs 2809
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 30 June 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10707 vs 9662 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2422 vs 1901 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 vs 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 vs 2809 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 3x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 524 vs 228
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 2784
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 2784
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 524 vs 228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 vs 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 vs 2784 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10707 | 9662 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 228 | 524 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2422 | 1901 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 | 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 | 2809 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP108 | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 30 June 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 773 | 776 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 25.50 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s | 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1800 million | 1,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX330 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
