NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1093 MHz
- 875.1x more texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10707 vs 10582
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2784 vs 2645
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2784 vs 2645
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 11 January 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1093 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s vs 43.72 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10707 vs 10582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 vs 2645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 vs 2645 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 318 vs 228
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3242 vs 2424
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4941 vs 3808
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4941 vs 3808
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 318 vs 228 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3242 vs 2424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 vs 3808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 vs 3808 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10707 | 10582 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 228 | 318 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2424 | 3242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 | 2645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 | 2645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 | 4941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 | 4941 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | GP108 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 11 January 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 769 | 771 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 1093 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 25.50 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s | 43.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1800 million | 1,870 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,399 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX330 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 750
