NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 5.1x more core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1594 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10706 vs 4592
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2405 vs 1042
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2227
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2227
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2784 vs 878
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2784 vs 878
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3808 vs 1397
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3808 vs 1397
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 1 September 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10706 vs 4592 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2405 vs 1042 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 vs 1397 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 228
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 vs 228 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10706 | 4592 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 228 | 241 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2405 | 1042 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 | 1397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | GP108 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 1 September 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 757 | 1380 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 25.50 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1800 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX330 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon X300 SE
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 400
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAGRID K220Q
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAT600
