NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 7340.6x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 120
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 9.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2805 vs 283
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3695
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1701
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3695
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1701
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 28 June 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 120 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2805 vs 283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1701 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
- Around 26% higher memory clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 371 vs 241
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 vs 241 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2805 | 283 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12521 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1701 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
Code name | GP107 | RV630 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 28 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 681 | 646 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 120 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 3300 million | 390 million |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 35.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 2200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 |