NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.9x more boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 3915x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 12 GTexel / s
- 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 46% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 1200 MHz
- 12.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2806 vs 218
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1247
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1247
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 29 September 2005 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s vs 12 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 24 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2806 vs 218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1247 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1247 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 272 vs 241
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 272 vs 241 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2806 | 218 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 272 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12521 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1247 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1247 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Curie |
Code name | GP107 | G71 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 29 September 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 681 | 1040 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.77 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel/s | 12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 3300 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-III |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 600 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | |
OpenGL | 2.1 |