NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and AMD Radeon HD 6870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2000x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 151 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 9.5x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3750 vs 2208
- 5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28933 vs 4950
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 4238
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 4238
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 21 October 2010 |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 50.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 151 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 vs 2208 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 vs 4950 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 vs 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 vs 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6870
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1120 vs 896
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 307
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 857.798 vs 849.116
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1120 vs 896 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 vs 307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 857.798 vs 849.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3710 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | 2208 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 416 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 857.798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.41 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.514 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.41 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Barts |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 21 October 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 524 | 812 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $239 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 1120 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,016.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 220 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 134.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |