NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs AMD Radeon R9 370X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and AMD Radeon R9 370X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- 1223.3x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 82.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 79% higher memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 5600 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28933 vs 25659
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 27 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 82.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 5600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 vs 25659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 896
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1139.703 vs 849.116
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 6326
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 6326
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 896 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 vs 849.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 vs 6326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 vs 6326 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370X
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD Radeon R9 370X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 25659 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 1139.703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 8393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 8393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD Radeon R9 370X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Trinidad |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 27 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 524 | 526 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1280 |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 82.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 221 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 179.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||

