NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 975 MHz
- 1076.9x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 93.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 2810
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3264
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 2810
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3264
- Around 18% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2065 vs 1745
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 19 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 93.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 vs 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 vs 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3264 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2065 vs 1745 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 896
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4470 vs 3737
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 661 vs 304
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1230.47 vs 849.116
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 896 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4470 vs 3737 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 vs 304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1230.47 vs 849.116 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3737 | 4470 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 661 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29036 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 1230.47 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2065 | 1745 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.399 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.371 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 345.793 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 19 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 546 | 548 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $270 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 975 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 93.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 4,313 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 192.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |