NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 6985.4x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 896 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3750 vs 830
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 253
- 10x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28933 vs 2902
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 849.116 vs 166.832
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 1951
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3324
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 1951
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3324
- 6.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2114 vs 327
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 18 June 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 vs 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 vs 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 vs 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 vs 166.832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 vs 327 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 166.832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | 327 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GF108 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 18 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 524 | 1311 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Price now | $54.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 585 million |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 40.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |