NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1152 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1417 MHz
- 1481.9x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 7008 MHz
- Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29180 vs 18143
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3579
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3579
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 3 January 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1152 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1417 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 68.02 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 7008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29180 vs 18143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3579 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5373 vs 3732
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 304
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 6326
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 6326
- Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2219 vs 2029
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5373 vs 3732 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 vs 304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 vs 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 vs 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 vs 2029 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3732 | 5373 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 355 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29180 | 18143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 8059 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 8059 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2029 | 2219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GP107 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 3 January 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 515 | 521 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1417 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1152 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 68.02 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 112.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |