NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 311.5x more texture fill rate: 79.68 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 180 Watt
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 vs 2 November 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- Around 19% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 2048
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 480
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14696 vs 7753
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55424 vs 43499
- 5.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1471 vs 274
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
Pipelines | 2432 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 vs 480 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14696 vs 7753 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55424 vs 43499 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1471 vs 274 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 876 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | 14696 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43499 | 55424 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 274 | 1471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA107 | GP104 |
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 | 2 November 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 348 | 250 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 159.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.20 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.100 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 180 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |