NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla P4
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and NVIDIA Tesla P4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1245 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- 468.4x more texture fill rate: 79.68 GTexel/s vs 170.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 391
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43499 vs 37924
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 vs 13 September 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s vs 170.1 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 391 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43499 vs 37924 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9097 vs 7753
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9097 vs 7753 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 391 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | 9097 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43499 | 37924 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 274 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA107 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 | 13 September 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 348 | 349 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 1063 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 159.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.20 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.100 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s | 170.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |

