NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64091 vs 39050
- 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 103
- 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 103
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 January 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1920 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64091 vs 39050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 103 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10687 vs 9723
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 481 vs 410
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16345 vs 15485
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16345 vs 15485
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10687 vs 9723 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 481 vs 410 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16345 vs 15485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16345 vs 15485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3707 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9723 | 10687 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 | 481 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64091 | 39050 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 234.866 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2849.031 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.956 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 147.291 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 809.639 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15485 | 16345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15485 | 16345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 103 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5513 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU106 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 6 January 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 242 | 296 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 1792 |
| Boost clock speed | 1647 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1227 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 137.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | large | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550A
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A310
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon 780M
