NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1470 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16576 vs 11748
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 859 vs 483
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87035 vs 78123
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 246.191 vs 168.08
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3885.018 vs 1935.102
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.053 vs 22.794
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 165.463 vs 111.023
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1271.757 vs 1001.496
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 vs 17328
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 vs 17328
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz vs 885 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16576 vs 11748 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 vs 483 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87035 vs 78123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 vs 168.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 vs 1935.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 vs 22.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 vs 111.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 vs 1001.496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 vs 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 vs 17328 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Around 6% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2176
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 5567
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 5026
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 5567
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 5026
- 3420.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6841 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 2176 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 5026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 5026 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6841 vs 2 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16576 | 11748 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 | 483 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87035 | 78123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 | 168.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 | 1935.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 | 22.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 | 111.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 | 1001.496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 8912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 8055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 8912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 8055 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 6841 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU106 | TU106 |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 145 | 178 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1185 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 885 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2176 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 2304 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.8 B | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Length | 9.0” (228.60mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8 pin | None |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |