NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87113 vs 77150
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.053 vs 24.769
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 vs 14699
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 vs 3720
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 vs 3369
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 vs 14699
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 vs 3720
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 vs 3369
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87113 vs 77150 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 vs 24.769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 vs 3369 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1470 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16670 vs 16574
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 859
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 vs 246.191
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 vs 3885.018
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 165.463
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 vs 1271.757
- 4744x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9488 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1470 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16670 vs 16574 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 vs 859 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 vs 246.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 vs 3885.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 165.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 vs 1271.757 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9488 vs 2 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16574 | 16670 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 | 927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87113 | 77150 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 | 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 | 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 | 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 | 254.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 | 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 9488 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
Code name | TU106 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 7 July 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $400 |
Place in performance rating | 145 | 148 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 1605 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2176 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | |
Render output units | 64 | 64 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.8 B | 10.3 B |
Compute units | 40 | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Length | 9.0” (228.60mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 8 pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Width | 2-Slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |