NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1470 MHz vs 1046 MHz
• Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• 3.4x more pipelines: 2176 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16476 vs 3572
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 856 vs 548
• 7.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87635 vs 12020
• 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 241.214 vs 40.695
• 6.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3870.683 vs 588.094
• 8.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.021 vs 3.205
• 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.92 vs 30.455
• 7.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1269.445 vs 166.26
• 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 vs 4921
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 vs 1577
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 vs 1671
• 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 vs 4921
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 vs 1577
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 vs 1671

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 175 Watt
• 596.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1193 vs 2

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16476 3572
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	856 548
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	87635 12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	241.214 40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3870.683 588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.021 3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	160.92 30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1269.445 166.26
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20969 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5567 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5026 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20969 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5567 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5026 1671
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2 1193

Compare specifications (specs)