NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super versus NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1470 MHz versus 1046 MHz
- Environ 47% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1650 MHz versus 1124 MHz
- 3.4x plus de pipelines: 2176 versus 640
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 4.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16476 versus 3572
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 856 versus 548
- 7.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 87635 versus 12020
- 5.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 241.214 versus 40.695
- 6.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3870.683 versus 588.094
- 8.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.021 versus 3.205
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.92 versus 30.455
- 7.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1269.445 versus 166.26
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 versus 4921
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 versus 1577
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 versus 1671
- 4.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 versus 4921
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 versus 1577
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 versus 1671
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 22 July 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz versus 1046 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz versus 1124 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2176 versus 640 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16476 versus 3572 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 856 versus 548 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 87635 versus 12020 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 241.214 versus 40.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3870.683 versus 588.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.021 versus 3.205 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.92 versus 30.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1269.445 versus 166.26 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 versus 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 versus 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 versus 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 versus 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 versus 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 versus 1671 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 68 Watt versus 175 Watt
- 596.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1193 versus 2
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt versus 175 Watt |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 versus 2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16476 | 3572 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 856 | 548 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 87635 | 12020 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 241.214 | 40.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3870.683 | 588.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.021 | 3.205 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.92 | 30.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1269.445 | 166.26 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 1671 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 1193 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | TU106 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 22 July 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $395.75 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 148 | 787 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $343.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2176 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
| Pipelines | 2176 | 640 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 68 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.8 B | 1,870 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 44.96 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
| Longeur | 9.0” (228.60mm) | 202 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8 pin | None |
| Largeur | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
AMDFireStream 9370
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
IntelArc A580
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
IntelArc A770M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800S
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
IntelArc Pro A60
