NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 14480 vs 3718
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 14480 vs 3718
- 9.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32624 vs 3358
- 9.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32624 vs 3358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 20 September 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 14480 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 14480 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32624 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32624 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 928 vs 823
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16721 vs 11313
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 28731 vs 20983
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 28731 vs 20983
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 928 vs 823 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16721 vs 11313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 28731 vs 20983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 28731 vs 20983 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 7 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 823 | 928 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11313 | 16721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20983 | 28731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20983 | 28731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 14480 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 14480 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32624 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32624 | 3358 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 128813 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 397.811 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5325.991 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.067 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.783 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1777.259 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU106 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 3 | 6 |
| Price now | $489.99 | $1,279.99 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | 17.22 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
NVIDIATITAN V CEO Edition
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
