NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26506 vs 18604
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26506 vs 18604
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 639 vs 602
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16100 vs 12357
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26506 vs 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26506 vs 18604 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 639 vs 602 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16100 vs 12357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3711
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3711
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3356
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 8029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 8029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26506 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26506 | 18604 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 639 | 602 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16100 | 12357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109685 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7393 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU106 |
Place in performance rating | 118 | 121 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | |
Price now | $489.99 | |
Type | Laptop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 604.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.35 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.35 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 151.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 302.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |