NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20372 vs 13044
  • Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20372 vs 13044
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 20062 vs 7164
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 20062 vs 7164
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 29 January 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed 1215 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt vs 230 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20372 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20372 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 20062 vs 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 20062 vs 7164

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1440 MHz
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 601
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13994 vs 12354
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1440 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 775 vs 601
PassMark - G3D Mark 13994 vs 12354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 30848
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 30848

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
601
775
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12354
13994
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20372
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20372
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20062
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20062
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
30848
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
30848
30936
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7557
PassMark - G2D Mark 601 775
PassMark - G3D Mark 12354 13994
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20372 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20372 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 20062 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 20062 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30848 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30848 30936
Geekbench - OpenCL 68523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU106 Vega 10
Launch date 29 January 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 3 16
Price now $489.99 $999
Type Laptop Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 49.06 13.37
Launch price (MSRP) $999

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1440 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 1215 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 10,800 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6