NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18604 vs 13044
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18604 vs 13044
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 7164
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 7164
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 7164 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 780 vs 601
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13169 vs 12354
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 8029
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 8029
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 780 vs 601 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13169 vs 12354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 8029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 8029 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7393 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 | 780 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 | 13169 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 | 30936 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69537 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU106 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 121 | 120 |
Price now | $489.99 | $999 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | 13.37 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |