NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16112 vs 8827
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 vs 767
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88096 vs 39028
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 251.703 vs 116.142
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3742.063 vs 1022.932
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.153 vs 9.235
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.341 vs 84.034
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1304.365 vs 607.721
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 11281
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3695
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 11281
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3695
- Around 56% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1569 vs 1005
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 October 2018 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 185 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16112 vs 8827 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 vs 767 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88096 vs 39028 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 vs 116.142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 vs 1022.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 vs 9.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 vs 84.034 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 vs 607.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 vs 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 vs 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1569 vs 1005 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16112 | 8827 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 | 767 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88096 | 39028 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 | 116.142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 | 1022.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 | 9.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 | 84.034 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 | 607.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1569 | 1005 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU106 | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | 17 October 2018 | 18 April 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $229 |
| Place in performance rating | 151 | 341 |
| Price now | $499.99 | $169.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 42.76 | 76.21 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1257 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 185 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | 5,700 million |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
IntelArc A580
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
IntelArc A770M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600S
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6300
