NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs AMD Radeon RX 580
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 und AMD Radeon RX 580 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 5 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 12% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1410 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Etwa 21% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1620 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Etwa 6% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 175 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Etwa 75% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- Etwa 83% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16112 vs 8827
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 vs 767
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88096 vs 39028
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 251.703 vs 116.142
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3742.063 vs 1022.932
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.153 vs 9.235
- Etwa 82% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.341 vs 84.034
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1304.365 vs 607.721
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 11281
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3695
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 11281
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3695
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1569 vs 1005
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 17 October 2018 vs 18 April 2017 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1620 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16112 vs 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 vs 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88096 vs 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 vs 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 vs 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 vs 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 vs 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 vs 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 vs 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 vs 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1569 vs 1005 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16112 | 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 | 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88096 | 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 | 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 | 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 | 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 | 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 | 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1569 | 1005 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Codename | TU106 | Polaris 20 |
Startdatum | 17 October 2018 | 18 April 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $499 | $229 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 151 | 341 |
Jetzt kaufen | $499.99 | $169.99 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 42.76 | 76.21 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN-Generierung | 4th Gen | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1620 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 2304 | 2304 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 175 Watt | 185 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10,800 million | 5,700 million |
Berechnungseinheiten | 36 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texturfüllrate | 192.96 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 229 mm | 241 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Überbrückungsfreies CrossFire | ||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 256 GB/s | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |