NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 versus AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and AMD Radeon RX 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1257 MHz
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1340 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 6% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 185 Watt
- Environ 75% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 8000 MHz
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16112 versus 8827
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 versus 767
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 88096 versus 39028
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 251.703 versus 116.142
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3742.063 versus 1022.932
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.153 versus 9.235
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.341 versus 84.034
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1304.365 versus 607.721
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 versus 11281
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3695
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 versus 11281
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3695
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1569 versus 1005
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 October 2018 versus 18 April 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1257 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1340 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 185 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 8000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16112 versus 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 versus 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88096 versus 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 versus 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 versus 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 versus 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 versus 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 versus 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 versus 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 versus 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1569 versus 1005 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16112 | 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 | 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88096 | 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 | 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 | 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 | 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 | 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 | 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1569 | 1005 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | TU106 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 17 October 2018 | 18 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $229 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 151 | 341 |
Prix maintenant | $499.99 | $169.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | 76.21 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 185 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 5,700 million |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 241 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |