NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 200 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16170 vs 16063
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 824 vs 749
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.062 vs 226.447
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.133 vs 25.476
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 154.621 vs 118.544
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1303.435 vs 1106.12
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 19811
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 19811

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1410 MHz
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1620 MHz
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 88130
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 vs 3729.447
• Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 vs 8875

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16170 16063
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	824 749
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	88130 105171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	252.062 226.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3729.447 4161.764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.133 25.476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	154.621 118.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1303.435 1106.12
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22615 19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22615 19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	8875 10685

Compare specifications (specs)